RONULO Versus. Individuals
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church regarding San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Although not, at the time of your own marriage, this new going officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, refused to solemnize the marriage upon discovering your couples failed to safe a wedding license. Since an effective recourse, Joey, who was simply after that sporting barong tagalong, and you can Claire, clad inside a married relationship clothes, along with their mothers, sponsors and you can traffic, proceeded on Independent Church out of Filipino Christians, known as the latest Aglipayan Chapel. They expected the petitioner, a keen Aglipayan priest, to perform a service to which the latter assented despite been advised by couples they had zero relationships certificate.
It is required, although not, towards the contracting functions to seem in person up until the solemnizing manager and state regarding presence off not less than a couple witnesses out-of courtroom years that they capture one another because the spouse and you may wife
New petitioner prepared their choir and you will planned a size on the partners for a passing fancy day. The guy conducted the fresh ceremony on visibility of the bridegroom, the latest fiance, their parents, the main and you will additional sponsors while the rest of their allowed subscribers.
The brand new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you will Mary Anne Yere, testified with the occurrences of one’s ceremony. Joseph is the fresh new veil sponsor when you’re Mary Anne are the wire sponsor on the relationships. Mary Anne affirmed you to she noticed brand new bride to be walk down the brand new section. She plus saw the couple exchange the wedding rings, hug each other, and sign a document. She read new petitioner instructing the main sponsors to help you sign the fresh new matrimony bargain. Afterwards, it went along to the brand new reception, got meal and you will Kent hookup sites took photo. She spotted the fresh petitioner there. She also identified the wedding invitation made available to the woman of the Joey.
Fl Umadac, mom out-of Joey, affirmed one to she heard the couple claim into the service one they just take both once the couple. Months following the relationship, she visited the new civil regional civil registrar from San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte that have Atty. Mariano Roentgen. Nalupta Jr. in which she received a certificate one to zero relationships permit are given to your couples.
This new petitioner, while admitting that he held a service, rejected you to definitely his work from true blessing the couple are tantamount so you can a good solemnization of one’s relationship because contemplated by-law.
ISSUE: Claimed the fresh petitioner was responsible for violating Article 352 of one’s Changed Penal Code (RPC) to possess allegedly undertaking an illegal marriage ceremony.
RATIO: Petitioner used an illegal wedding ceremony. Brand new crime just like the taken to when you look at the Ways 352 of one’s RPC is the abilities of ily Password and therefore reads:
(3) A wedding ceremony that takes place into the look of the latest contracting activities through to the solemnizing administrator and their personal statement that it bring each other due to the fact wife and husband from the exposure regarding no less than one or two witnesses off judge ages.
Artwork. 6. Zero given function or spiritual rite to the solemnization of the relationship is needed. That it declaration is going to be part of the matrimony certification and therefore will become closed from the employing people as well as their witnesses and attested by the solemnizing officer.
The fresh new Supreme Judge informed me one just what made the fresh new petitioner’s work a good marriage service and not soleley only true blessing are one to if you are there’s no prescribed mode otherwise spiritual rite, all that is requisite is “on the hiring activities to look myself before solemnizing administrator and declare throughout the exposure from no less than one or two witnesses out of courtroom age that they need both as the spouse and you may wife.”
To what very first criteria, the new petitioner accepted your parties appeared in advance of your and therefore truth are affirmed so you’re able to from the witnesses. With the next specifications, we discover one to, resistant to the petitioner’s allegation, the new prosecution has proven, from the testimony of witnesses, that contracting events in person declared that they get both because wife and husband. Ergo, it’s obvious one petitioner conducted a marriage ceremony rather than a mere blessing.